Page:Complete Works of Count Tolstoy - 13.djvu/276

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
256
CRITIQUE OF DOGMATIC THEOLOGY

the Father. He that honoureth not the Son, honoureth not the Father which hath sent him (John v. 21-23).”

What is said about the healing on the Sabbath, is also said here, namely, that a man may cure on the Sabbath, and may decide for himself what is to be done, so long as he lives in a godly manner and tries to be as perfect as the Father, and that man is the Son of God and ought to be honoured like God.

“For as the Father hath life in himself, so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself (v. 26).” (p. 50.) This means only what Jesus has been teaching all the time, that the true life is the knowledge of the true God, and that each man has this life in himself. All these passages, without speaking of their significance, have one undeniable meaning, namely, that Jesus Christ acknowledges himself to be precisely such a son of God and of man as all other men, and not only does not equal himself to God, as the Jews slanderously say he did, but constantly opposes himself to God. The words “my beloved Son,” even if they are spoken from heaven, mean only that Christ is a son of God, like any other man, but beloved of God.

“(4) To the evidence of the Old Testament writings: Search the Scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: And they are they which testify of me (John v. 39).” (p. 50.)

The Scriptures speak of the Prophet, of his teaching, but there is not even a hint as to his divinity.

“Another similar incident presented itself soon. When the Saviour once came into a temple at Jerusalem, and the Jews, surrounding him, kept asking persistently: How long dost thou make us to doubt? If thou be the Christ, tell us plainly (John x. 24), he, replying to them, said, among other things: I and my Father are one (v. 30).” (p. 50.)

This is a conscious lie. He did not reply, among other