Page:Shakespearean Tragedy (1912).djvu/46

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
30
SHAKESPEAREAN TRAGEDY
lect. i.

in what we now call heredity, or to have attached much importance to it.

What, then, is this ‘fate’ which the impressions already considered lead us to describe as the ultimate power in the tragic world? It appears to be a mythological expression for the whole system or order, of which the individual characters form an inconsiderable and feeble part; which seems to determine, far more than they, their native dispositions and their circumstances, and, through these, their action; which is so vast and complex that they can scarcely at all understand it or control its workings; and which has a nature so definite and fixed that whatever changes take place in it produce other changes inevitably and without regard to men’s desires and regrets. And whether this system or order is best called by the name of fate or no,[1] it can hardly be denied that it does appear as the ultimate power in the tragic world, and that fit has such characteristics as these. But the name ‘fate’ may be intended to imply something more—to imply that this order is a blank necessity, totally regardless alike of human weal and of the difference between good and evil or right and wrong. And such an implication many readers would at once reject. They would maintain, on the contrary, that this order shows characteristics of quite another kind from those which made us give it the name of fate, characteristics which certainly should not induce us

  1. I have raised no objection to the use of the idea of fate, because it occurs so often both in conversation and in books about Shakespeare’s tragedies that I must suppose it to be natural to many readers. Yet I doubt whether it would be so if Greek tragedy had never been written; and I must in candour confess that to me it does not often occur while I am reading, or when I have just read, a tragedy of Shakespeare. Wordsworth’s lines, for example, about
    poor humanity’s afflicted will
    Struggling in vain with ruthless destiny

    do not represent the impression I receive; muich less do images which compare man to a puny creature helpless in the claws of a bird of prey. The reader should examine himself closely on this matter.