U.S. Department of Justice
Attorney Work Product // May Contain Material Protected Under Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)
back on his assertion of conflicts, telling the President they did not count as true conflicts.[1] Bannon recalled telling the President that the purported conflicts were "ridiculous" and that none of them was real or could come close to justifying precluding Mueller from serving as Special Counsel.[2] As for Mueller's interview for FBI Director, Bannon recalled that the White House had invited Mueller to speak to the President to offer a perspective on the institution of the FBI.[3] Bannon said that, although the White House thought about beseeching Mueller to become Director again, he did not come in looking for the job.[4] Bannon also told the President that the law firm position did not amount to a conflict in the legal community.[5] And Bannon told the President that the golf course dispute did not rise to the level of a conflict and claiming one was "ridiculous and petty."[6] The President did not respond when Bannon pushed back on the stated conflicts of interest.[7]
On May 23, 2017, the Department of Justice announced that ethics officials had determined that the Special Counsel's prior law firm position did not bar his service, generating media reports that Mueller had been cleared to serve.[8] McGahn recalled that around the same time, the President complained about the asserted conflicts and prodded McGahn to reach out to Rosenstein about the issue.[9] McGahn said he responded that he could not make such a call and that the President should instead consult his personal lawyer because it was not a White House issue.[10] Contemporaneous notes of a May 23, 2017 conversation between McGahn and the President reflect that McGahn told the President that he would not call Rosenstein and that he would suggest that the President not make such a call either.[11] McGahn advised that the President could discuss the issue with his personal attorney but it would "look like still trying to meddle in [the] investigation" and "knocking out Mueller" would be "[a]nother fact used to claim obst[ruction] of
- ↑ Priebus 4/3/18 302, at 3; Bannon 10/26/18 302, at 13 (confirming that he, Priebus, and McGahn pushed back on the asserted conflicts).
- ↑ Bannon 10/26/18 302, at 12-13.
- ↑ Bannon 10/26/18 302, at 12.
- ↑ Bannon 10/26/18 302, at 12.
- ↑ Bannon 10/26/18 302, at 12.
- ↑ Bannon 10/26/18 302, at 13.
- ↑ Bannon 10/26/18 302, at 12.
- ↑ Matt Zapotosky & Matea Gold, Justice Department ethics experts clear Mueller to lead Russia probe, Washington Post (May 23, 2017).
- ↑ McGahn 3/8/18 302, at 1; McGahn 12/14/17 302, at 10; Priebus 1/18/18 302, at 12.
- ↑ McGahn 3/8/18 302, at 1. McGahn and Donaldson said that after the appointment of the Special Counsel, they considered themselves potential fact witnesses and accordingly told the President that inquiries related to the investigation should be brought to his personal counsel. MceGahn 12/14/17 302, at 7; Donaldson 4/2/18 302, at 5.
- ↑ SC_AD_00361 (Donaldson 5/31/17 Notes).
documents. 10/27/11 Letter, Muellers to Trump National Golf Club, The Muellers have not had further contact with the club.
81
