NOTES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY not translated thus by Hort. Singer's rendering seemed to me more probable, — though I have made a slight modifi- cation at the end. For it seemed to me less question- begging to translate tu>i> fxeXXovrwv as " what they are about to be," rather than " what they are becoming," as Singer does. 58. Ibid., I. I. II-. 59. Ibid., III. 8. i; Cf. II. 6. 6. Sometimes what the ancients took for " male " and " female " were really dif- ferent species. 60. Ibid., II. 8. 4. 61. Charles Singer, " Greek Biology and its Relation to the Rise of Modern Biology," in Singer's Studies in the History and Method of Science, Oxford, 1921; Vol. 11. p. 98. 62. For the next few pages I have followed, in the main: Theodor Meyer-Steineg, Geschichte der Medizin, Jena, 1921; Max Neuburger, History of Medicine, Trans- lation by Ernest Playfair, Oxford, 1910; Vol. I.; Sir T. Clifford Allbutt, Greek Medicine in Rome, London, 1921, 63. Soporific or some kind of anesthetic expedients seem to have been used commonly, to deaden pain. 64. Sir Clifford Allbutt does not eliminate this con- fusion, properly enough, from his interesting discussion of the matter, in chapter X of his Greek Medicine in Rome, o.c. 65. Cf. III. I. with III. 2. of Galen; On the Natural Faculties, with an English Translation by Arthur John Brock, in The Loeb Classical Library, New York, 1916. 66. F. H. Garrison, Introduction to the History of Medicine, Philadelphia, 1921,3 p. 105. 67. Galen, On the Natural Faculties, o.c, n. 6$. 68. Brock, in his Introductioti, p. XXX, compares him with Bergson. 69. Why not protoplasmic? 70. On the Natural Faculties, Brock's Translation, o.c, I. s. 71. On The Natural Faculties, Brock's Translation, o.c, I. 5-8, with an occasional verbal alteration.
[150]
[150]
