California v. Phillips Petroleum Company

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
California v. Phillips Petroleum Company
Syllabus
932944California v. Phillips Petroleum Company — Syllabus

United States Supreme Court

391 U.S. 365

California et al.  v.  Phillips Petroleum Co. et al.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

No. 373.  Argued: N/A --- Decided: May 20, 1968[1]

Certiorari granted; 377 F. 2d 278, vacated and remanded.


Mary Moran Pajalich and J. Calvin Simpson for petitioners in No. 373. Frederick T. Searls and Malcolm H. Furbush for Pacific Gas & Electric Co., C. Hayden Ames for San Diego Gas & Electric Co., and John Ormasa for Southern California Gas Co. et al., petitioners in No. 380. Solicitor General Marshall and Richard A. Solomon for petitioner in No. 385.

Tom P. Hamill, R. D. Haworth, James L. Armour, William H. Tabb, and Carroll L. Gilliam for respondent Mobil Oil Corp. in all three cases.

PER CURIAM.

Notes

[edit]
  1. Together with No. 380, Pacific Gas & Electric Co. et al. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. et al., and No. 385, Federal Power Commission v. Phillips Petroleum Co. et al., also on petitions for writs of certiorari to the same court.

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse